Monday, May 23, 2011

Jury watches 9/11 and 7/7 truth films, acquits defendant

Editor's note: Anthony John Hill, a.k.a. Muad'Dib, has been fearlessly striving to defend Muslims from the slanderous accusations arising from the 7/7 false-flag attack. He has spent much of the past year in jail for his trouble. This brave man, who is not a Muslim, is following the sunna of our Prophet pbuh far better than most Muslims are -- and I'm not talking about his beard! As I wrote last March 16th:

Good news: On March 8th, Muad'Dib was released from jail, where he was awaiting trial on charges of "attempting to corrupt the judicial system." In fact, Muad'Dib's alleged "crime" -- sending his 7/7 truth DVD to judge and jurors -- was clearly an attempt to PREVENT the corruption of the judicial system. Muad'Dib's Alice-in-Wonderland experience with British "justice" has included repeated denials of his requests for bail on the grounds that he failed to attend the bail hearings. Yet the very government that demanded his presence at the bail hearings refused to allow him to attend them by keeping him locked in his cell! Are we watching a re-make of Catch-22 or is this Monty Python meets Franz Kafka? Tune in and meet one of the bravest political prisoners of our time, 7/7 truth-teller Muad'Dib. (Interview archived here -- scroll ahead to the second hour.)

May 21, 2001

Accused in 7/7 Trial Acquitted

Anthony John Hill found not guilty after jury watched films on 7/7 and 9/11; while Pentagon employee injured on 9/11 has been denied trial in the US


On May 12, at Southwark Crown Court in London, a jury returned and declared MuadDib (Anthony John Hill) innocent of attempting to "pervert the course of justice".

The jury watched MuadDib's film, The Ripple Effect, and heard in-depth discussions of both 7/7 and 9/11.

Mr Hill claimed that these were, in fact, false-flag attacks carried out for the purpose of providing a pretext for invading countries in the middle east in order to control their natural resources.

This is, perhaps, the first time such allegations of false-flag terror attacks have been made in front of a jury that apparently found them credible, and acquitted the accused.

Pentagon employee April Gallop's case filed in the United States has been denied a hearing before a jury.

On March 15, 2010, a Federal Judge in the Southern District of New York dismissed the complaint filed by Pentagon employee April Gallop and her son against Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Myers and as-yet unidentified government and military officials named as John Does.

Ms. Gallop's appeal has been dismissed by the United States Court of Appeals in New Haven, Connecticut.

The United States government is vigorously opposed to open examination of what really happened on 9/11.


  1. from Gordon Duff

    Last week, John Anthony Hill, was found “not guilty” of the charge of “perverting the course of justice” by a jury in Britain. He supposed crime was mailing a video to a court to be used as evidence in a trial. The video was considered “not allowable” for British (or Americans) to see. However, I have it here in its entirety, free of charge and free of government censorship

    One point worth mentioning is that he mailed the video, one that is on Youtube for anyone in the world (except Germany where Youtube in blocked) to see, from Ireland. Thus, his “crime” was placing a copied Youtube video in a mail box in Ireland, that contains information that makes a slam dunk case for British government involvement in killing British citizens, with a little help from Israel.

    This may be the single biggest violation of international standards of freedom of speech, as guaranteed by the United Nations, in history. However, a British jury wasn’t buying. Thank you good citizens of Britain!

    Better still, the trial wasn’t legal maneuvering about illegal extradition or abuse of free speech. Instead, Hill took the stand and explained to the jury, under vigorous cross examination, pretty much what the video’s above tell us, that the US with Britain and Israel staged terror attacks, 7/7, 9/11 and so many more themselves and blamed it on an imaginary group called “Al Qaeda” and a CIA operative and lifelong friend of the Bush family, Osama bin Laden.

    “Lifelong friends” of the Bush family have been in trouble before. Anyone remember John Hinkley, the young Mormon who shot President Reagan? As with the bin Laden’s, the Hinkley’s were “lifelong friends” and business partners of the Bush family. Another Bush family business partner was Adolf Hitler. When you add the Bush family exporting firm run by the uncle, you can add Manuel Noriega and Saddam Hussein to the list too.

    Ah, but we digress into areas best left along, back to John Anthony Hill’s trial. What happened in this trial, what will not be reported, is that the real case was a presentation of facts by the British government and John Anthony Hill. Hill postulated that both 7/7 and 9/11 were false flag terror attacks, perpetrated with full complicity by the British and American governments.

    The “crown” attacked Hill as a “conspiracy nut.”

    The jury sided with Hill, finding the American and British governments, who were not on trial, complicit in the murders of thousands of their own people.

    Find this on the news if you can?

  2. Rather interesting that his name is that of the Desert-dwelling hero in Frank Herbert's Dune