Cowardice vs. courage in the American Muslim community

The first community of Muslims showed tremendous courage. Despite horrific persecution and ongoing threats to life and limb, they stood by the truth of prophetic revelation, waging all-out jihad (effort, struggle) so that truth should triumph over lies.

Today's Muslims are different. As the Prophet Muhammad, peace upon him, said: 

"Your number will be great. But you will be without substance, like the foam on the face of a river; and Allah will remove from the breasts of your enemies the fear of you; and Allah will throw wahn into your hearts.' One of the companions asked, 'What is wahn, O Allah's Apostle?' And the Prophet responded, 'Wahn is to love this life, and to hate death!'"

American Muslims love the good life so much that they have become complicit in a genocidal big lie against their community - against their sisters and children and brothers in Islam, and against themselves. Two million Muslims have been murdered on account of this blood libel, yet few speak out.

American Muslims know that 9/11 was an inside job.  The polls tell us that about two-thirds admit this openly to a non-Muslim stranger working for an opinion research firm. The actual figure, considering that people tell pollsters what they think the pollster wants to hear, must be closer to 90%.

Yet only a tiny fraction of that 90% of American Muslims stands up for truth. How many tithe to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth or contribute to Muslims for 9/11 Truth or The Wisdom Fund? How many organize demonstrations and events in their communities? How many distribute DVDs and books proving the 9/11 inside job to their friends and acquaintances? How many demand that the Muslim community stand up en masse for truth?

The vast majority of American Muslims seems to be expecting Allah to be extraordinarily merciful. For if they ever face rigorous justice, they will surely burn in hell for their cowardice.

A good example of this hellfire-bound cowardice is the angry response of some Muslims, or people calling themselves Muslims, to a leading Missouri political figure, M.D. Alam, who had the courage to speak out for 9/11 truth.

Here is one example:

On Jul 16, 2012, at 11:31 AM, Mark Harrod wrote to MD Alam:

Assalamul alaikum Brother Alam,

I have read over your material. You are making life more difficult for Muslims in the U.S. Please stop.

Politics appears to be your passion, but it is not your forte. I appreciate that you are trying to get involved in a civic area that is noticeably lacking for Muslims. But you do not have the language or social skills to interface in this highly-nuanced field where every word can and likely will be analyzed by pundits and Islamophobes. You obviously have some skeletons in the closet with your public online comments about 9/11 conspiracies. That's regretful. These missteps, your writings, and talks without any specifics on YouTube reflect on the larger Kansas City Muslim community. You obviously don't represent us, but you and will be the "Muslim candidate" or "Muslim Democratic operative." Please stop.

We will all by questioned by our Creator about how we worked for this religion; I am telling you sincerely that I fear for your questioning and the ultimate harm you are doing to the already battered public face of this faith. For the sake of Allah, please stop dabbling in local and state politics to the detriment of Muslims in Missouri and nationwide. Grassroots political efforts are fine for anyone, but running for political office on a long-shot candidacy with tepid Muslim support and without the finely-tuned support, staff, and skills needed for a political office run on the state level is at best embarrassing and at worst irresponsible and problematic. Please stop.

Mark

In fact, it is the damnable cowards like Mark (assuming that Mark is Muslim - there are undoubtedly many psy-ops professionals at work in this field) who have "made life difficult for Muslims in the US." Had American Muslims risen with one voice to denounce 9/11 as the obvious false-flag operation that it was, and put all of their energy and resources into 9/11 truth, two million of our brothers and sisters would still be alive, and tens of millions more would not have had their lives ruined. But the cowards whispered like the demonic waswaas: "Think about your reputation with the non-Muslims! Your job! Your family! Your high standard of living! You could lose all the wonderful things in this dunya if you stand up for the truth!"  And most Muslims obeyed the whisper of the shaitan.

M.D. Alam is one of the few who did not. For standing up and speaking the truth - the truth that 90% of Muslims inside and outside the United States know and, at least in their hearts, acknowledge - he has been assailed by the same sort of people who stoned and crucified and made war on the Prophets of God.

It is true that M.D. Alam is a second-language English speaker, and that his remarks on 9/11 should have been more precise and accurate. But at least he had the courage to speak up! And when the inaccuracies in his choice of wording were pointed out to him, he apologized and corrected himself.

Will the cowards who have not stood up against the genocidal Big Lie of 9/11 ever apologize and correct themselves? They had better do so as soon as possible, and make sincere tawba. Allah knows that they are complicit in the racist slaughter of two million of their brothers and sisters based on the biggest lie the Shaitan ever told. By not standing for truth, they are standing for the Shaitan and his lie. When they meet their Lord, they are going to have a lot of explaining to do.

Top Missouri Democrat questions 9/11, gets witch-hunted

Sgt. MD Alam served his country in the first Gulf War.

MD Alam, a top Democratic Party official and Secretary of State candidate in Missouri, is being witch-hunted by the Zionist owned and operated media for questioning 9/11. A native of Bangladesh, Alam made the mistake of conflating "Jew" with "Israeli" (a common conflation in much of the world including Bangladesh) in pointing out the suspiciously minuscule number of Israeli deaths in the Twin Towers. 

Israeli-owned Zim Shipping Lines, which occupied 17,000 square feet of the 17th floor of the North Tower, broke its lease by moving out one week before 9/11; and Israeli-based Odigo Instant Messaging broadcast a message in Hebrew telling people to stay out of lower Manhattan on the morning of 9/11. The result of Israeli foreknowledge and warnings: At most three Israelis died in the Towers, compared to 47 victims from the Dominican Republic,  18 from Columbia, 11 from Germany, 41 from India, 24 from Japan, 16 from Jamaica, and so on. Given that New York's financial district is, if not exactly Israeli-occupied territory, a place where Israelis are vastly overrepresented in proportion to their percentage of the global population, the dearth of Israeli deaths in the Towers was highly suspicious, and MD Alam should be commended, not witch-hunted, for raising this question.

MD Alam is running for Secretary of State on behalf of the 99%.  Inspired by Dr. Martin Luther King's example, he has a vision of American Muslims integrating productively into American society as the phony "war on terror" ends and we start focusing on rebuilding our economy and solving our real problems.

Imran Hosein: Zionist 9/11 perps WANT Islamist takeover in Syria!

Imran Hosein

Imran Hosein, one of the first Islamic leaders who spoke out for 9/11 truth, is truly one-of-a-kind. I know of no other Muslim thinker (or non-Muslim thinker for that matter) who combines such sophisticated eschatology with an equally sophisticated understanding of world affairs. Compared to him, the Christian "end times" people are babies in a playpen.

In the article below, Shaykh Imran asks a very good question: Why are the radical Likudnik Zionists cheering for - and working for - the overthrow of relatively secular regimes in places like Iraq and Syria? Why are the Zionists HELPING the sunni jihadists loosely known as al-Qaeda? Do they actually WANT an Islamist takeover in Syria?

Shaykh Imran says yes - the radical Likudnik Zionists WANT to be surrounded by "radical Islamist regimes." That will give them the excuse they need to escalate the anti-Islam "clash of civilizations" narrative built on their 9/11 false-flag attack, and launch a big war against their neighbors. The real purpose of this war would be twofold: To steal more land, and to finish the ethnic cleansing of Palestine. Under the "fog of war," the Likudniks hope to murder or expel all Palestinians living between the River Jordan and the Mediterranean Sea, including the 20% of Israeli citizens who are Arab. This would be one of the worst genocides in history.

-Kevin Barrett

URGENT STATEMENT

http://www.imranhosein.org

Thursday, 08 Sha'ban 1433 We are about to witness what we long anticipated, to wit: a Turkish-led NATO attack on Syria to remove the present Syrian regime and replace it, Libyan-style, with another so-called Islamic regime. How else will Israel be able to claim that a ‘rising Islam’ now menaces that country, and that Israel is being surrounded by that menacing Islam and must wage pre-emptive war in order to survive? How else will Israel be able to replace USA as the next ruling State in the world unless she wages great wars – particularly against her Arab neighbors who surround the Zionist State? Turkey’s pro-NATO and hence pro-Zionist Government seems about to commit the ultimate act of foolishness in claiming the shooting-down of a Turkish warplane by Syria as causus bellum that justifies a Turkish military invasion of Syria. Such a Turkish military invasion of Syria would of course, have nothing to do with avenging the loss of an airplane and two pilots. Rather, it would have nothing less than Syrian regime-change as its primary objective. That military adventure would be an act of supreme foolishness for the following reasons: Syria has been on a high alert for some time now expecting external intervention (Libyan-style) in support of a Zionist-engineered armed insurrection that has so far failed to take-over the country. A Turkish warplane that enters into Syrian airspace cannot expect, in such circumstances, to be treated as an innocent intruder.  If Russia and China respond to a Turkish military invasion of Syria by coming to the support of that country, that will eventually provoke the Malhama (great war) prophesied by Prophet Muhammad (sallalahu ‘alaihi wa sallam). That Malhama will be so great that it will make the first and second world-wars look like a fight over peanuts. The Turkish government should remember that the Prophet (sallalahu ‘alaihi wa sallam) also prophesied that the Malhama or great war will lead to the conquest of Constantinople. It should not take Turkish Muslims long to realize that the 1453 conquest of Constantinople by Sultan Muhammad Fatih had nothing to do with the prophecy.  Turkish Muslims will then wake up to the monstrous betrayal of their pro-Zionist government and prepare for the civil war that will fulfill the prophecy.   Thus a Turkish military invasion of Syria will eventually lead to Turkish civil war and to the liberation of the city of Constantinople from NATO’s venomous control. Since Russia will inevitably enter in the war in defense of Syria, the Turkish military invasion of that country will lead to yet another prophecy of Prophet Muhammad (sallalahu ‘alaihi wa sallam) being fulfilled, to wit: “that you (Muslims) will make an alliance with Rum (pronounced as ‘room’).” Rum in the Qur’an referred to the Eastern Christian Byzantine Empire. But after Constantinople was conquered in 1453, the capital city of Rum eventually became Moscow. This statement is issued to so guide Muslims that they may not be brainwashed by Protestant Islam’s Zionist Jihad, and by the inevitable CNN/Al-Jazeerah-led propaganda barrage that will now inundate mankind.

Egyptian President to expose FBI in 1993 WTC bombing?

Egypt's new President Mohammed Morsi doesn't believe the official story of 9/11.

And he apparently also doubts the official story of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. 

According to ABC News, President Morsi recently said:

""I see banners for Omar Abdel Rahman's family, and for prisoners arrested according to martial rulings and detainees from the beginning of the revolution...It is my duty to make every effort, and I will beginning tomorrow, to secure their release, among them Omar Abdel Rahman."

Omar Abdel Rahman, the so-called "blind Sheikh," was the patsy-in-chief set up to take the blame for the mobbed-up New York FBI office's bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993. (The FBI also orchestrated the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, according to convicted bomber Terry Nichols.)

Even the New York Times, which led the cover-up of both World Trade Center bombings, cited tapes proving that FBI informant Emad Salem, who created and led the 1993 bombing plot, repeatedly discussed with his FBI handlers the fact that the FBI was responsible for the bombing: 

"Do you deny," Mr. Salem says he told the other agent, "your supervisor is the main reason of bombing the World Trade Center?" Mr. Salem said Mr. Anticev did not deny it.  -NY Times

 Many if not all of the Muslims who were falsely convicted of the FBI's act of terrorism were obviously innocent. Would Mohammed Salameh really have tried to get his $400 deposit back on the van used in the bombing if he had known about the plot? "Mohammed A. Salameh had returned three times to a Ryder Truck Rental dealer in Jersey City requesting a refund of the $400 cash deposit he had placed on a yellow Ford Econoline van." -Who Bombed the U.S. World Trade Center? — 1993  Growing Evidence Points to Role of FBI Operative  By Ralph Schoenman  (published in Prevailing Winds Magazine, Number 3, 1993)

Lynn Stewart, the lawyer for the innocent Muslims framed for the FBI's act of terrorism, was herself convicted on trumped-up charges in retaliation for her efforts to expose the FBI's terrorism and frame-up of her clients.

Egypt's new president "doubts al-Qaeda role in 9/11"

Add Mohamed Morsi to the lists of heads of state who openly support 9/11 truth. Presidents Ahmadinejad of Iran, Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, former PM Mahathir Mohamad of Malaysia, and Fidel Castro of Cuba preceded him. -KB

Top Egyptian presidential candidate doubts al Qaeda role in 9/11

by Ben Birnbaum, The Washington Times

Mohamed Morsi

Egypt’s likely next president has long called for the U.S. to hold a “scientific conference” to determine the real culprits of the Sept. 11 attacks, having cast doubt on al Qaeda’s role in 9/11 for years.

“The U.S. administration has never presented any evidences on the identity of those who committed that incident,” longtime Muslim Brotherhood leader Mohamed Morsi is quoted as saying in a 2007 posting on Ikhwanweb, the Islamist group’s official English website.
“The Muslim Brotherhood and others demanded a transparent trial with clear evidence and to have court rulings,” he said after the sixth anniversary of the attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people. “We confirm that this isn’t a defense to those who committed these actions, but we only seek the truth.”

Mr. Morsi last week won the most votes in the first round of Egypt’s presidential election, and he is heavily favored to win a runoff this month against secular former Prime Minister Ahmed Shafik.

He is not the only candidate to have floated conspiracy theories about the Sept. 11 attacks: Abdel Moneim Aboul Fotouh - a former Brotherhood figure who finished fourth in last week’s race - said last year that he believed 9/11 was “part of a conspiracy.”

Mr. Morsi’s remarks underscore the challenges the U.S. likely will face in a Brotherhood-dominated Egypt. The group’s Freedom and Justice Party won 47 percent of the seats in Egypt’s parliamentary elections and is expected to play a dominant role in crafting a new constitution.

A call for proof

While condemning the 9/11 attack “regardless of its doer,” Mr. Morsi lambasted the U.S. response to them, calling the Bush administration “the world’s terrorism leader” and accusing it of getting “in line with Israeli occupation forces in aggression, injustice, encroaching lands and raping women.”

According to the Brotherhood website’s characterization of his 9/11 remarks, Mr. Morsi said the U.S. invaded Afghanistan and Iraq “due to the U.S. administration claims that the doers of the 11 September attacks [were] Muslims, without proving such a thing until now.”

In 2008, Mr. Morsi called on the U.S. to provide “scientific” proof for its account of events.

“We have officially demanded a fair trial for 9/11 suspects and the issuance of a detailed scientific report about the attacks, but the U.S. administration did not respond till now,” Mr. Morsi told Ikhwanweb.

“This requires a huge scientific conference that is devoted to analyzing what caused the attack against a massive structure like the two WTC towers,” he said, referring to the World Trade Center. “Should this happen, we will stand firmly against whoever committed this horrific crime against innocent civilians.”

However, Osama bin Laden, the late al Qaeda leader, admitted his terror group’s involvement in the Sept. 11 attacks in a videotaped message in October 2004...   (read complete story)

(False! Bin Laden repeatedly denied responsibility for 9/11, deplored the attacks,  called them un-Islamic, and blamed "some people with their own agenda" and "American Jews" for the attacks in repeated statements before his death in December, 2001.)

9/11 ‘truther’ leading Egyptian presidential race

Abdel-Moneim Abolfotoh

May 21, 2012

The Washington Times


9/11 ‘truther’ leading Egyptian presidential race

By Ben Birnbaum

An Islamist who believes that the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the United States were an American conspiracy is the front-runner in Egypt’s presidential race, a new poll shows.

Abdel-Moneim Abolfotoh, formerly a leading figure in the Muslim Brotherhood, led the field of 13 candidates with 32 percent of the vote in a survey released Monday by the Washington-based Brookings Institution.

Mr. Abolfotoh expressed his views on the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon in an interview last year with Egypt scholar Eric Trager.

Mr. Trager, now with the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, quoted Mr. Abolfotoh as saying:

“It was too big an operation …. They didn’t bring this crime before the U.S. justice system until now. Why? Because it’s part of a conspiracy.”

Egyptians will vote Wednesday and Thursday in their first presidential election since the toppling of Hosni Mubarak last year. If none of the candidates wins a majority, the two top vote-getters will compete in a runoff next month.

A ‘liberal Islamist’?

The 61-year-old Mr. Abolfotoh, who left the Brotherhood last year, has been dubbed a “liberal Islamist” by some reporters partly because he said he believes that a Christian should be able to run for president - a view that put him at odds with the Brotherhood’s leadership.

In a recent Egyptian television interview, Mr. Abolfotoh qualified that position. He said that, while parties are free to nominate whomever they want, Egypt “cannot have a president who does not have an Islamist orientation.”

The Washington Institute’s Mr. Trager said that “the notion that Abolfotoh is some kind of progressive is farcical.”

“He is a longtime Muslim Brother, a founder of the Islamist student movements of the 1970s, and somebody who still calls for implementing the Shariah,” he said. “His falling out with the Brotherhood was over differences regarding strategy and internal administration, not ideology.”

Mr. Abolfotoh has been endorsed by al-Gama’a al-Islamiya, a jihadist group the State Department designated as a terrorist organization.

“Given that he was endorsed by a terrorist organization and has called the peace treaty with Israel a national-security threat, it is highly unlikely that Egypt’s foreign-policy will remain friendly to U.S. interests if he’s elected,” Mr. Trager added.

Mr. Abolfotoh’s candidacy has seen several lucky breaks lately.

First was the disqualification last month of hardline preacher Hazem Abu Ismail from the race. The Salafist Nour Party, which had backed Mr. Abu Ismail, later threw its support to Mr. Abolfotoh.

In addition, the disqualification of the initial Muslim Brotherhood candidate, Khairat al-Shater, and his replacement with a less charismatic candidate, Mohammed Mursi, has caused a swing of Muslim Brotherhood support to Mr. Abolfotoh. Mr. Mursi, 60, was favored by only 8 percent of those polled in the May 4-10 Brookings survey of 773 Egyptian voters.

Closest rival

Mr. Abolfotoh’s closest rival in the presidential race appears to be Amr Moussa, a secular former foreign minister and Arab League chief. Mr. Moussa, 76, drew 28 percent support in the survey.

Mr. Moussa has repeatedly said that Egypt cannot afford “an experiment” in Islamist democracy, while Mr. Abolfotoh has blasted Mr. Moussa and another leading candidate, former Air Force commander Ahmed Shafiq, for their ties to the fallen regime. Mr. Shafiq, 70, received 14 percent support in the poll.

Mr. Abolfotoh and Mr. Moussa squared off recently in a four-hour televised debate that featured several sharp exchanges.

At one point, Mr. Abolfotoh called Israel “an enemy” and pressed Mr. Moussa to do the same. Mr. Moussa demurred, saying that Egypt’s next president should “not push it along with slogans towards a confrontation we may not be ready for.”

The winner of the election will have a large effect on the direction of the revolution that toppled Mr. Mubarak. The outcome could have far-reaching consequences in particular for the country’s besieged Christian minority, for Egyptian-Israeli relations and for the role of religion in public life.

Islamists so far have capitalized on the disorganization of liberal parties, winning two-thirds of the vote in the parliamentary elections.

The Brookings poll also shows that 66 percent of Egyptians support making Islamic law the basis of Egyptian law. But, in response to another question, 83 percent of Egyptians said they prefer applying Shariah in “spirit,” adapted to modern times.

Asked to pick a model for Egypt among six Muslim countries - Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Iran, Malaysia, Morocco, and Tunisia - 54 percent of those surveyed chose Turkey and 32 percent chose Saudi Arabia.

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan also emerged as a favorite in the poll, with 63 percent of Egyptians naming him as the non-Egyptian world leader they admire most.

“Abolfotoh has said that he wants to be the Erdogan of Egypt, and I think that U.S. relations with Turkey may be a good example of what we could expect,” noted Stephen McInerney, executive director of the Project on Middle East Democracy.

“Turkey remains an important ally with whom the U.S. cooperates on a variety of shared interests. But on the surface, there is more tension between the two due to Erdogan’s inflammatory populist rhetoric and positions.”

Whistleblower Kevin Ryan: Muslims did not attack the U.S. on 9/11

Chemist Kevin Ryan was fired from his job at Underwriters Labs in 2004 for blowing the whistle on UL's participation in the cover-up of the explosive demolition of the three World Trade Center Skyscrapers. He has continued to expose the 9/11 inside job through research, publications, and talks. He recently spoke alongside Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth to an audience of more than 2000 people at the Nation of Islam's Saviour's Day event in Chicago.


Muslims did not attack the U.S. on 9/11

by Kevin Ryan

Since September 11, 2001, the United States has initiated a number of wars in Muslim countries. These wars, which would be more correctly called massacres, have resulted in the deaths of countless innocent Muslims. In some cases, attempts have been made to present these aggressions in the guise of humanitarian efforts to promote democracy. But the limited public support for U.S. military action around the world goes back to the U.S. government claim that Muslims were responsible for 9/11. This claim is untrue and it is past time for people to recognize that fact. . .

Read rest of the article at: http://digwithin.net/2012/03/17/muslims-did-not-attack-the-u-s-on-911/