Jury watches 9/11 and 7/7 truth films, acquits defendant

Editor's note: Anthony John Hill, a.k.a. Muad'Dib, has been fearlessly striving to defend Muslims from the slanderous accusations arising from the 7/7 false-flag attack. He has spent much of the past year in jail for his trouble. This brave man, who is not a Muslim, is following the sunna of our Prophet pbuh far better than most Muslims are -- and I'm not talking about his beard! As I wrote last March 16th:

Good news: On March 8th, Muad'Dib was released from jail, where he was awaiting trial on charges of "attempting to corrupt the judicial system." In fact, Muad'Dib's alleged "crime" -- sending his 7/7 truth DVD to judge and jurors -- was clearly an attempt to PREVENT the corruption of the judicial system. Muad'Dib's Alice-in-Wonderland experience with British "justice" has included repeated denials of his requests for bail on the grounds that he failed to attend the bail hearings. Yet the very government that demanded his presence at the bail hearings refused to allow him to attend them by keeping him locked in his cell! Are we watching a re-make of Catch-22 or is this Monty Python meets Franz Kafka? Tune in and meet one of the bravest political prisoners of our time, 7/7 truth-teller Muad'Dib. (Interview archived here -- scroll ahead to the second hour.)

May 21, 2001

Accused in 7/7 Trial Acquitted

Anthony John Hill found not guilty after jury watched films on 7/7 and 9/11; while Pentagon employee injured on 9/11 has been denied trial in the US

By Enver Masud, THE WISDOM FUND

On May 12, at Southwark Crown Court in London, a jury returned and declared MuadDib (Anthony John Hill) innocent of attempting to "pervert the course of justice".

The jury watched MuadDib's film, The Ripple Effect, and heard in-depth discussions of both 7/7 and 9/11.

Mr Hill claimed that these were, in fact, false-flag attacks carried out for the purpose of providing a pretext for invading countries in the middle east in order to control their natural resources.

This is, perhaps, the first time such allegations of false-flag terror attacks have been made in front of a jury that apparently found them credible, and acquitted the accused.

Pentagon employee April Gallop's case filed in the United States has been denied a hearing before a jury.

On March 15, 2010, a Federal Judge in the Southern District of New York dismissed the complaint filed by Pentagon employee April Gallop and her son against Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Myers and as-yet unidentified government and military officials named as John Does.

Ms. Gallop's appeal has been dismissed by the United States Court of Appeals in New Haven, Connecticut.

The United States government is vigorously opposed to open examination of what really happened on 9/11.