Saturday, June 30, 2012

Egyptian President to expose FBI in 1993 WTC bombing?

Egypt's new President Mohammed Morsi doesn't believe the official story of 9/11.

And he apparently also doubts the official story of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. 

According to ABC News, President Morsi recently said:

""I see banners for Omar Abdel Rahman's family, and for prisoners arrested according to martial rulings and detainees from the beginning of the revolution...It is my duty to make every effort, and I will beginning tomorrow, to secure their release, among them Omar Abdel Rahman."

Omar Abdel Rahman, the so-called "blind Sheikh," was the patsy-in-chief set up to take the blame for the mobbed-up New York FBI office's bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993. (The FBI also orchestrated the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, according to convicted bomber Terry Nichols.)

Even the New York Times, which led the cover-up of both World Trade Center bombings, cited tapes proving that FBI informant Emad Salem, who created and led the 1993 bombing plot, repeatedly discussed with his FBI handlers the fact that the FBI was responsible for the bombing: 

"Do you deny," Mr. Salem says he told the other agent, "your supervisor is the main reason of bombing the World Trade Center?" Mr. Salem said Mr. Anticev did not deny it.  -NY Times

 Many if not all of the Muslims who were falsely convicted of the FBI's act of terrorism were obviously innocent. Would Mohammed Salameh really have tried to get his $400 deposit back on the van used in the bombing if he had known about the plot? "Mohammed A. Salameh had returned three times to a Ryder Truck Rental dealer in Jersey City requesting a refund of the $400 cash deposit he had placed on a yellow Ford Econoline van." -Who Bombed the U.S. World Trade Center? — 1993  Growing Evidence Points to Role of FBI Operative  By Ralph Schoenman  (published in Prevailing Winds Magazine, Number 3, 1993)

Lynn Stewart, the lawyer for the innocent Muslims framed for the FBI's act of terrorism, was herself convicted on trumped-up charges in retaliation for her efforts to expose the FBI's terrorism and frame-up of her clients.


  1. First of all, Salem did not create or lead the bombing. Anticev led. Try to keep your story straight. You can't blame FBI and then say Salem did it. And then call Salem an informant.

    Did you slap this together from a wannabe anarchist thesaurus? Get your facts straight.

    Salem made the fake bomb.
    Anticev told him to make a real one.
    Salem got smart and taped them before that incident.

    Anticev led the bombing. Salem was making a fake bomb.

  2. LOL imagine that a head of state EXPOSING real life false flags kinda like what ahmadinejad did but im sure he provide more evidence.

  3. 9/11, US and Israel:

  4. oh ca c'est la strategie a utiliser face au sionisme et au djjalistes

    un tres beau coup... il nous invite pour parler du false flagisme ?

  5. The US Congress should seriously consider admitting Morsi's plea. If there is nothing wrong in considering release of Pollard owing to Israel's pressure, what's wrong in considering release of Omar owing to Egypt's request?

  6. Morsi had better watch his back. Mossad will be on his case in no time.

  7. If Mohammad Morsi tries to make good on his campaign promise to turn Jerusalem into the capital of his new caliphate, the Mossad and a lot more will be "on his case in no time." Given the fact that KSM's nephew, Ramzi Yousef, very openly and defiantly admitted to his role in the 1993 North Tower bombing attack in a lengthy and passionate tirade at his sentencing hearing, and proudly boasted that he'd do it again if he could, anyone claiming that it wasn't done by him and other radical Muslim fundamentalists is pretty foolish.

    1. Albury Smith, (demonstrable shill for zionist israel, gormless lying troll ) loves to argue about the times for building 7 to come down.

      It doesn’t matter if it took 10 seconds or 20 seconds, because, as NIST themselves have begrudgingly acknowledged, Building 7 did it fact reach free-fall acceleration for a period of ~2.5 seconds.

      In order for this to happen, according to all known scientific principles currently understood, building 7 must have been falling, for this time, through NOTHING BUT AIR!

      Not weakened steel, not cement, not even a stack of playing cards. Nothing but air!

      that means, that ALL support, across the entire building, over several floors, must have been removed, INSTANTANEOUSLY and SIMULTANEOUSLY.

      This is IMPOSSIBLE to achieve by fire alone, and without some sort of controlled explosive, and impossible for Albury to explain otherwise.

      The NIST report, that has received considerable criticism by many credible professionals, for being unscientific and incomplete, ( similar failings to the 911 commission report ) fails to offer any explanation for free fall acceleration, their modelling does not reflect real world events, it assumes how the building “probably” came down, and their model cannot be proven or disproved, as they refuse to release the full input data that would be needed to replicate the model, on the grounds of “National Security”

      Albury Smith pretends to be some sort of arbiter on all things to do with 911, and as you will find via a simple internet search for “Albury Smith 911 Truth” he has spent years trolling every website that mentions 911, to post his misinformation, disinformation obfuscation and lies, wherever he can, and you will see how he repeatedly demands answers from anyone who has the slightest doubt about the official version of events, to explain any straw man Albury can build, to his personal satisfaction, while he refuses to reveal his true identity, or any qualifications, pretending to be the worlds expert on 911.

      There is no evidence that stands up to scrutiny to support the official version of events, and there are thousands of pages of credible evidence, that shows the official story cannot be true. This is the consensus of thousands of professionals from all over the world, from a variety of professions, and the call for an independent transparent unfettered investigation with subpoena power is supported by a large majority of the worlds population, and is growing every day, despite the best efforts of Albury Smith and his ilk.

  8. Albury, you need to read Webster Tarpley's "9/11 Synthetic Terror." It explains how state-sponsored false-flag terror (by far the most common and destructive form of "terrorism") uses patsies, moles, and professional killers. The patsies are fanatics, morons, and/or dupes who are set up to take the blame by the real actors - the moles in the state apparatus, and the professional killers. Ramzi Yousef is a textbook patsy.

  9. well well imagine seeing a comment by "ALBURY SMITH GORMLESS SHILL HERE"

    albury smith shill ( aka ass ) is an unqualified, anonymous troll, a demonstrable liar, who spends his life trolling any website that refers to 911 truth, posting his unsolicited absurd misinformation, disinformation and obfuscations on every page possible, tirelessly and repetitively.. all the while pretending to be some sort of final arbiter, on all things 911 who, while remaining anonymous, continually slanders qualified experts

    the official version of events is nothing more than mere allegations. there has never been any credible evidence offered to support any of it. as a matter of fact, their own *evidence* actually proves 100% the official version of events can not be true, as a little investigation into the murray street engine shows...

    It doesnt matter how or what was used to bring building 7 down, or if it took ten seconds or thirty. The fact that building 7 fell at freefall acceleration for ~2.5 seconds, as acknowledged begrudgingly by NIST, IS evidence that explosives were used as it is IMPOSSIBLE for all the structural support necessary for freefall acceleration to be achieved to be removed instantaneously and simultaneously without some form of controlled demolition.

    as he well knows, and as he is unable to prove otherwise beyond any reasonable doubt, not just because he is an anonymous unqualified troll, but because the laws of physics applied just as much on 9-11 as they do today. any legitimate psychiatrist would therefore regard alburys position as insane.

    further evidence of his chutzpah can be witnessed via a simple internet search for "albury smith 9 11" - his pitiful efforts are quite amusing as he stuggles against an overwhelming growing majority of people who after looking into a few facts, find it not unreasonable for family members of the victims to be calling for a proper independent transparent unfettered investigation with subpoena power, as called for, by an overwhelming, continually growing, majority of the worlds population, a fact verifiable by past and recent polls.

    albury doesnt fool these folk at least..


    Check this site... May help...